Tuesday, 23 August 2005
total:spec - Elbow
Guy Garvey is the first to admit that few people like a musician getting political. “It's by far the quickest route to career suicide isn't it?” laughs the Elbow frontman. “To stand on a soap box and pretend you're Bono.”
And yet the title track of the Elbow’s recent album, Leaders Of The Free World, is Guy Garvey getting very political. The lyrics vehemently declare that ‘the leaders of the free world are just little boys throwing stones, and it’s easy to ignore ’til they’re knocking on the door of your house.’ The song was inspired by footage Guy had seen of George Bush senior and junior when Bush junior had been voted in for his second term. He was horrified to watch as the president all but shrugged his father off so he could hog the attention.
“I could suddenly see him as an eight-year-old,” says Guy. “A spoilt nasty little shit-for-brains. He’s officially the most powerful man in history.”
And so Guy wrote Elbow’s first political song, at least the first one that’s made it to an album. Although the song lends it’s title to the whole album, Elbow - also made up of drummer Richard Jupp, organist Craig Potter, guitarist Mark Potter, and bassist Pete Turner – haven’t made a record full of political messages.
“There's only one political song on there so it seems quite odd to give it that title, but at the same time we're living in pretty horrible times,” says Guy. “We've seen neat segregation of an otherwise peaceful country. I really feel for the Muslim community at the moment. It's very, very difficult for them. And hate is on the rise, on the march and I think it's important that you make your voice and opinion heard. I'm not after leading anyone into the valley of death, I'm just trying to let everybody know that Elbow won't be counted into this bullshit. We all know why [the London bombings] have taken place. People feel disenfranchised enough to be brain-washed to do these heinous things to their fellow countrymen and it's because of our involvement in illegal, immoral wars worldwide. The point is that Tony Blair has to accept some responsibility for what he's done against the wishes of the people of his country. Because now it's resulting in innocent death."
Despite his strong opinions on how our country is currently being governed, Guy says he has no desire to be the ‘indie Bono’. Instead he just finds it unusual that anyone wouldn’t have an opinion on such important issues.
"Of course I had qualms about doing a political song,” he says. “But I also feel a responsibility to the people of the country that I enjoy living in. And I also feel that everybody has a responsibility to have an opinion at the very least. It's not like everyone can sit back and watch everything now, because it's not happening on the other side of the world any more.
"I mean, it sticks in my fucking throat that nobody's pointed at him [Tony Blair] in the media. Because those [the anti-Iraq war demonstrations of February 2003] are the biggest public demonstrations this country's ever seen, and it wasn’t about the death of unions, it wasn’t about the poll tax and it wasn’t about anything that effects people on British soil directly. It was about our brothers and sisters on the other side of the world. It was the biggest public demonstration that the country has ever seen and he went ahead and did it anyway. And he lied in order to make it happen.
"Now this shit's [the bombings] been visited on us and he can stand there and say, ‘I told you so’? I don't fucking think so. He under-estimates the intelligence of the people in this country and he's a bad man. He's gone from mildly disappointing to thoroughly fucking destructive. So that's what we're trying to talk about with the record."
Whether Guy’s statements make any difference – to how our country is governed, to making people aware, to changing their opinion - remains to be seen. He’s one of many dissenting voices in the music world and beyond at the moment, and Guy’s unhappiness will certainly make his band’s fans look twice at Tony Blair.
As he sings in Leaders Of The Free World, ‘I think we dropped the baton like the 60s didn’t happen.’
"I'm sure musicians can make a difference,” he says. “This is the thing you see, it's impossible to measure creativity and positivity. We support the anti-landmine charity MAG, they are our charity of choice if you will. And the Mines Advisory Group operate in war zones all over the world. It doesn’t matter what the war was, where there's unexploded munitions, there are people cleaning them up. They unearthed a million volatile munitions in Iraq in one year. Now it's impossible to measure how many lives they saved but it's very easy to say how many lives were lost in a conflict. So how do you know whether these things make a difference? How do you know what would have happened if, for example, Live 8 hadn't taken place? It's impossible to measure."
So it's worth doing whatever, in that case?
"It's not even a case of that. It's not about whether it will do any good. It's everybody has a responsibility. I think the problem really with Western society is that everybody claims the right to every junction and nobody takes their responsibilities. They're absolutely outraged if they fall over a loose paving stone and break their knee but you'll step over a half-dead tramp without thinking about it. It's like, it can’t take all that much of people’s time.
“There you go, rant over," he laughs.
Elbow weren’t invited to play Live 8 but Guy would happily have got involved. The event’s effectiveness and point was debated hotly at the time – Would the world’s eight most powerful men take any notice of a rock concert? Wasn’t it more effective in selling records for those who performed? – but Guy feels there was too much criticism.
"I do think [the event] could have been more effectual,” says Guy. “But I think it was a positive gesture, definitely. I wasn’t very fond of all the criticism. There were some good points made about African musicians not being invited to perform, but at the same time it was to raise awareness amongst white Western kids, really. I’m not very fond of the armchair critics who don’t do anything themselves. How that's seen as a cynical money-grabbing gesture, I don't know. It was so obviously something positive, something benevolent."
Reaching out to people and getting them involved has become a running theme with Elbow. They’re very much an everyman band with none of the airs and graces of celebrity. Five blokes whose fans could be as comfortable sat down with them in the pub as come see them at a gig. A few thousand of Elbow’s fans have even appeared on one of their songs on their appropriately named second album Cast Of Thousands. For the single Grace Under Pressure the band recorded the crowd at Glastonbury 2003 singing the line, ‘We still believe in love so fuck you’ back at them.
“It kind of happened on stage,” remembers Guy. “I was just looking round at everybody and thought it would be great to hear them sing, so I thought, what's a good vibe? I said, 'Do you want to be on the next record?' and they all said yeah. I wanted it to have some anti-war sentiment because it was in the build-up to the whole thing that summer and it was on my mind. They were more than happy to oblige. We wrote Grace Under Pressure quite separately, we didn't know where we were going to put the crowd, but when we realised it was in the same key and a similar tempo we thought, it's meant to be, obviously."
Not all of the recording of Elbow’s last album was so easy. The genesis of Cast Of Thousands was beset by problems, beginning with the loss of Guy’s lyric book at the beginning of 2002. While the band were still promoting their debut album Asleep In The Back, Guy lost his notes and ideas for its follow-up on a train between their hometown of Manchester and London.
Then when recording finally began the five musicians experienced a great deal of pressure after the success of their debut.
“There was a sense of bewilderment and not really knowing what the root of your happiness is,” says Guy. “When all your dreams are delivered it's a very odd thing. It's almost like you feel you’re not allowed to be upset about anything anymore. It made us wonder about the root of happiness and that certainly comes through on songs like Ribcage on Cast Of Thousands. I mean, it was pressure from ourselves, it wasn’t from anywhere else. The first album never got a bad review to my knowledge and it was nominated for a Brit and a Mercury award. It couldn't have done better, and yet it still flew in under the radar. We were quite happy that it wasn't shoved down people's throats. It just sort of bubbled up and the record carried on selling steadily through word of mouth after we'd finished promoting it. We knew that there were a lot of people waiting for the second one, who had found the first one quite a personal record. So it was a lot of pressure to follow it.”
That pressure made the band ill. Guy suffered from psoriasis and insomnia while the rest of the band were unable to shake off a persistent flu bug. This went on until their record label stepped in and told them to take a break.
“Contrary to what people usually believe about record companies, that they stand there pointing at their watches, they actually said, 'You look like shit lads, have a bit of a break.’ So we did and when we came back and listened to what we’d done with a bit of distance, we realised we had the bulk of the record done and it was good enough and we all loved it. It was easy to carry on after that."
The band are used to working against the odds. Formed way back when in 1992 after meeting at college in Bury, the band (who took their name from a line in Dennis Potter’s The Singing Detective which said that the elbow was the most sensitive part of the body) based themselves in Manchester and toiled away for six years before finally landing a deal with Island Records in 1998.
“We always used to say, 'If it's not happened by March...',” says Guy. “I don't know why it was always March. But come March we'd have another gig at The Swan With Two Necks or The Frog and Bollock and that was enough to keep us together. There was always something on the horizon and there was always the 'who wants to be Pete Best' situation. We were always really paranoid that if any of us left then the rest would do it without us. That still keeps us together these days," he laughs.
When Island was bought up by Universal in 1999 the band were dropped, just as they were close to completing their debut album. EMI then showed some interest but just as quickly withdrew their offer. Then the band, who had gone back to working in part-time jobs, were saved by Manchester-based label Uglyman Records. An EP release caught the attention of V2 and the rest is history.
“When I listen to Asleep In The Back now I can identify frustrations that I wasn’t aware were in the record at the time,” says Guy, “and that gives it a sort of rawness, an edgy vibe which it would be wrong to try and recapture because that's not how life is anymore.
"Similarly the mood of Cast Of Thousands, aside from all the problems, was really celebrating success and trying as much as possible to include as many people in that as we could. Hence experimenting with gospel choirs, and the whole Glastonbury experiment coming off was just a joy. Getting that many people involved with a record, we were really proud of that.
"This album [Leaders Of The Free World] sees everybody settled into their roles a little bit more. Being comfortable with being respected and paid for what we love the most. I think of the three it will be the classic Elbow record, the one that defines us in the future."
Sunday, 24 July 2005
total:spec - Goldfrapp
Goldfrapp
are in a strange place right now. We're not talking about their base in Bath , although this also
seems like an odd place for the band when you realise it's there that they
create their sleazy sci-fi pop music. No, Goldfrapp are in a strange place
because they seem to be making the difficult but (to some bands) important
crossover to mainstream success, and they're not really sure whether they want
it.
"People
say that we're going big this time and I just think, nah," says Alison
Goldfrapp, frontwoman extraordinaire and the effortlessly glamorous face of the
band that bears her surname. "Especially as I think I can be quite
pessimistic most of the time. I was one of those people at school who came
bottom of the class. I permanently had this idea that I just wouldn't
happen," she laughs.
But
Alison did happen. Along with her partner in the sublime Will Gregory, composer
extraordinaire and the geeky faceless half of the band, this curiously
beautiful woman has become a very successful pop star, one of huge cult status
and a dedicated fan following. The band might not have big hit singles (who
does these days?) but the dense, introspective and otherworldly sounds of their
debut album Felt Mountain has soundtracked many a party of the post-club or
dinner kind, while the blithe, futuristic glam rock singles that came from
their vastly different second album Black Cherry never fail to fill an indie
club dancefloor.
With
Goldfrapp's new album Supernature you get the best of both the band's worlds.
Recent single Ooh La La took the glam rock influences to their inevitable
conclusion by aping the Norman Greenbaum classic Spirit In The Sky, and
Supernature revealed itself to be a heady concoction of growling, seductive pop
music and haunting music noir. The duo seemed to have brought together all the
elements of their past endeavours to create a distinctive Goldfrapp 'sound'.
"I
hate the idea of settling into anything particularly," says Alison.
"But I would say that we've definitely found a place where we’ve found a
sound. But it feels like a sound where there is also a lot more room to explore
in, to evolve and develop. So that’s a nice feeling, actually. I feel like
we're developing what we’re doing and evolving and not sticking to a formula.
Obviously you develop a sound - you're always drawn to certain things that are
you but I think it’s that feeling that you’re always pushing it as well. It’s
getting that balance.
"I
think Supernature is definitely a lot more confident and there’s a simplicity
to it which I really like. And that was something that we definitely wanted to
do, simplify what we did. Because we always used lots of layers and textures
and there was something quite challenging for us about holding back on that
temptation to fill up the sound all the time."
"We
both feel really lucky that we’ve broadened our sound dials," adds Will.
"It feels now, in a way, that we can do more or less what we like. I’m
sure we will play around with different stuff in the future. It’s good fun,
it’s like dressing up. It’s all part of the glam, putting on a different outfit
and seeing how you look in it, checking yourself out in the mirror. I think
musical styles are bit like that and it’s good fun to do it. You don’t want to
get stuck in your ways. In the 90s there was a lot of people just wearing the
all black look and you had to stick to your one little furrow otherwise you
wouldn't be taken seriously. I think that’s disappearing a bit, thank God. I’m
sure we’ll always be mucking about with all sorts of different sounds."
The
hype about Supernature began to build long before its release, with 'those in
the know' in the music industry saying that the album would be the one to take
the band to the next level; that it would be a huge success and Goldfrapp would
become a mainstream commodity.
"It’s
nice that people had this very positive reaction to the album," says
Alison. "It’s quite interesting because with Black Cherry it was such a
radical move from the first album that people were a bit like, 'What the fuck
are you doing?' But with this album they seem to have got the gist of it. I did
so many interviews with Black Cherry where I had to really justify why we’d
done what we’d done. Whereas with this album it seems I haven't had to do that,
which has been quite nice actually, I have to say. I think we’re a bit more in
people’s radar this time."
And yet
would being in the mainstream sit well with Goldfrapp? Despite the hype
surrounding the latest album there are certain elements to the band that could
keep them at the level of cult success. Their music is immediate and catchy,
sure, and Alison's lyrics are ambiguous to the point that her ideas and imagery
are very accessible, but although the duo say they have simplified their sound,
it may still be the case that the music and the accompanying visual theatrics
that are such an integral part of the band are a little too quirky for
mainstream tastes, with a little too much English eccentricity
"I
do feel a bit weird, possibly, about the idea of being mainstream," says
Will. "I don’t know. Mainstream equals average to me sometimes. Not
always, there’s some really excellent things that become mainstream aren’t
there? He said trying to think of some," he laughs. "But yeah it’s a
bit scary. But who knows, we’ll see. It may well not happen."
Whether
the band themselves become household names remains to be seen, but what is
definitely happening is that their ideas about music are making their influence
on popular culture felt. Last year former S Club 7 singer Rachel Stevens
released the single Some Girls - to great acclaim considering Rachel herself is
not thought of very highly in the grand scheme of the pop world. Produced and
written by pop maverick Richard X, who was also behind Sugababes' innovative
Freak Like Me, Some Girls was an irresistible slice of glam pop funk that
pressed all the right buttons despite its charisma-free singer. But what was
also notable about it was that many reviews compared the song to Goldfrapp.
"I
think I heard it once on Top Of The Pops and thought it was very bland,"
sniffs Alison. "I really hope that people don’t think we’re bland like
that. I’ve nothing against her. I mean the poor girl probably doesn't have
anything to do with what she does anyway. I don't see any relation to what
we’re doing at all. One, we write and produce and mix what we do ourselves and
I think that song is a million miles away from what we do. I think it was the
whole thing with Richard X and us that got it going. He was supposed to do a
remix [of 2003 single Strict Machine] for us and we got it back and we didn’t
really like it. Obviously he’d got all the parts of Strict Machine and took
that onboard, that idea, and used it for Rachel Stevens.
"It’s
a weird one because when Ooh La La first got played on the radio someone said,
[adopts dumbass voice] 'Ooh it sounds just like Rachel Stevens.' And there's
that weird thing of, because she’s so mainstream and we haven’t had that kind
of exposure, obviously there's always going to be people who think that that
somehow came from her. People kept saying, 'Oh you must be really pissed off
about it', and I was like, 'No, not really.' You can't claim a sound. When
people were doing a shuffle beat in the 70s, everyone was doing it."
"I
just thought it was another glam beat tune," adds Will. "And I
thought maybe it was jumping on the bandwagon to do a glam song. But you know,
it’s not that a swing beat and that vibe is owned by anybody. I though it was
totally cool really."
"It’s
for everyone’s taking," continues Alison. "And I think, in a way, it
did us a favour because it got people talking about Goldfrapp."
"But
it is a bit strange seeing people pick up on your ideas," says Will.
"It’s a little bit like when you have a conversation at a party or
something and you’re shouting really loudly and suddenly everyone stops talking
and their listening to you. It’s a bit alarming."
Alison's
love of the attention and Will's desire to stay on the periphery of the
limelight might seem like a conflict of interests but it's actually what makes their
partnership work so well. On stage and in photos Alison is always the focus.
Will rarely appears in photos and doesn't even spend much time on stage when
they perform live - "I’m usually trying to get the sound sorted out,"
he says. Both are happy with this state of affairs.
"I
sometimes worry that it falls on her shoulders rather heavily," says Will.
"But it was always really set up like that from the beginning. Even where
the music’s concerned there’s a very strong role for Alison. She's the lead protagonist
in the drama of each song. She’s the leading lady and there isn't really a
leading man, shall we say," he laughs.
"We
just do whatever both of us feel comfortable with and we’re always making sure
that both of us are comfortable with the way it is," says Alison.
"Will hates touring and ultimately there’s no point in someone being there
if that’s what they hate doing. I think that that’s why a lot of bands have
terrible problems - there's so much pressure to be this constant tight-knitted
thing where you have to do everything together. Our band is about the writing
and the music and the whole idea of it rather than being forced to do something
that we don’t want to do. And Will’s quite comfortable with not being the
visual focus. And I’m definitely more comfortable. Being the singer I guess
that naturally happens anyway."
With
Will very much in the background, it's sometimes hard not to think of Alison as
a solo artist. Her glamorous and inventive image, her English rose good looks
and her magnetic stage presence mark her out as one of pop's most engaging and
attention-demanding divas. But Alison says she finds it hard to relate to pop's
other divas - the likes of Beyonce Knowles or Kylie Minogue.
"I
think Kylie’s a great performer and a great dancer and she’s got a great pair
of cheekbones but that’s about it really," says Alison. "It’s like
they’re a separate identity to the whole music and imagery. They have a whole
entourage of people doing it for them so I find it hard to know what they are.
They seem to have these personalities that are very generic and so I can’t
really relate to them. I can’t really relate to it on a personal level at all,
because I never really understand where the personal comes into what they do.
As long as they of grin at everybody 24 hours a day then that seems to be all
that’s required. There's lots of great singers in the past that didn’t have
anything to do with the music but somehow you got a much more of a sense of
their personality."
Goldfrapp
have a very different shape in the studio. It's much more of a team effort.
While the lyrics are Alison's area, she always runs her ideas by Will. He is
more knowledgeable about computers but they both play every instrument and
produce their albums together.
"We’re
quite interchangeable in a way," says Will. "It’s just two of us
having a bit of a laugh a lot of the time, improvising. If somebody has an idea
they run with it, the other person totally dismisses it, then has another idea.
It’s a bit of a tag race. Do we argue? On a good day we don’t really talk much
at all, actually. It’s just getting on with it and just going, 'Yes. No. That’s
good. I like that bit.' We don't tend to argue very much about music for some
reason. I think that’s why we do it together, we seem to agree rather a lot
about what’s good and what’s bad about music. I think it’s quite amazing
considering the amount of time we spend together in the same room that we don’t
have lots of arguments actually."
The
pair met in 1999 after a mutual friend passed a demo tape of Alison's singing
on to Will, who was already making a name for himself as a film composer.
Alison had begun her singing career guesting on tracks for the likes of Tricky
and Orbital, but in Will she found a like-minded soul.
"I
was bored of working with people who seemed to be much more interested in what
was cool or fashionable and what bpm they should be doing," says Alison.
"What’s great about Will is that he’s very open-minded and even though
he’s classically trained he’s the only person I’ve ever met that I feel
musically I can relate to. He understands how I think about music and vice
versa. He’s someone that I feel that there’s so much more to do with."
What
did you think of each other when you first met?
"I
was rather surprised," says Will. "Obviously I’d heard her voice and
because it sounded so huge, I was perhaps expecting somebody really huge,"
he laughs. "Someone who would fill the door frame. But of course she’s
not, she’s relatively petite. We got on straight away, had a laugh. Alison’s very
funny."
"We
talked a lot about music and the kind of things we liked," adds Alison.
"And the kind of things we wanted to do, that we hadn’t felt like we’d had
the opportunity to do with anyone else. And we sent a lot of music to each
other. We’d do little tapes and we really checked each other out before we
started doing anything. Which is a really nice way of doing it, actually.
Discovering each other and where we were at musically."
What
happens next to Goldfrapp seems to involve just more of the same. However
successful Supernature is, it will do little to change the band's modus
operandi, except that Alison would love more money to indulge the band's visual
aspect when they're on tour - as they hit the road in October it will only be
at Brixton Academy
in London that
fans will experience the full effect of Alison's imagination. Otherwise
Goldfrapp will continue to bend the rules - both their own and the rules of pop
music - shaking up popular culture and making their indelible (and very
glittery) mark on it.
"It’s
always good to start with rules and ideas," says Alison. "But you’ve
also got to be open and free to let that change and evolve. And I think things
always do evolve naturally. It’s just about being open to let that
happen."
total:spec - The Oscars
For all the criticism the Oscars gets there is no doubt that all the world's eyes will be on the Kodak Theatre in Hollywood California on Sunday March 5, 2006.
There the red carpet will be laid, by which photographers and journalists from the world over will set up camp, all to cover the 78th Academy Awards ceremony. But long before the arrangements for the ceremony even begin to be made, long before Gwyneth, Kate and Uma begin to try on the various dresses they've been sent by the world's best designers, and long before fashion critics begin to sharpen their claws for their commentary on those dresses, the film industry is already thinking about Oscar night.
It's been a vintage summer blockbuster season, with a plethora of colourful event movies. We've been guided around the galaxy, a chocolate factory and a sinful city; we've been introduced to new film superheroes and seen old ones begin again; there's been violent showdowns aplenty - between a married couple, a Jedi Knight and his mentor and, not least, two worlds; and to cap it all there's been the inevitable TV remakes with the return of a nose-wiggling witch and their lordships the Dukes of Hazzard.
But as the summer season winds down, already Oscar is a golden glint in Hollywood's eye. The bright, shiny colours of the big effects-laden, humour-driven, popcorn-eating summer blockbusters begin to fade as children return to school, autumn begins to fall and cinema-goers prepare to get serious again. For the Oscars - and this is one of the many criticisms laid down against the ceremony - aren't about films that have fun, make people laugh or escape to other worlds. At least very rarely. What attracts Oscar's sombre gaze are films that are far more serious - films about real life, our history; that have tragic stories and worthy subject matter.
Film companies have got the routine down pat. They know that when the time comes for the Academy members to put pen to paper and place their votes for each award category, they're going to remember the films of the last six months much better than those released earlier in the year. As such the autumn and winter seasons see cinemas showing films that are more about filling film-goers heads with thoughts than their stomachs with popcorn.
This year it started early. As far back as August we saw the release of Crash, an ensemble drama set on the streets of Los Angeles that follows the events in the two days following, natch, a car crash. The crash brings together the lives of a cross section of the multi-ethnic populace of the city, played by the likes of Sandra Bullock, Don Cheadle (who was nominated for Best Actor for Hotel Rwanda at this year's Oscars), Matt Dillon, Brendan Fraser, Thandie Newton and Ryan Phillippe. Written and directed by Paul Haggis, who was nominated for Best Screenplay for the otherwise multi-Oscar-winning Million Dollar Baby this year, Crash has everything the Academy seems to like in a film - drug problems, lengthy and thoughtful dialogue, marriage problems, race issues and violence. And will we see an Oscar nomination for the before now ignored Sandra Bullock?
More likely to get one is Russell Crowe. Despite his difficult reputation behind the camera, in front of it the Australian-born actor is highly respected and has good Oscar form, most notably with director Ron Howard, who he works with again on boxing drama Cinderella Man. The pair's last project, A Beautiful Mind - in which Crowe played real life character John Nash, a brilliant but asocial mathematician - might have been deemed unworthy of Oscar attention by many, but it cleaned up in 2002, getting Best Film, Best Director, Best Screenplay and Best Supporting Actress for Jennifer Connelly.
Crowe and Howard returned to a real-life, historical character for Cinderella Man. In the film, which came out in September, Crowe plays Depression-era fighter and common-man hero Jim Braddock, who defeated heavyweight champ Max Baer in a 15 round fight in 1935. Again it has those elements that Oscar seems to love - historical, personal and emotional drama. And to give it added Oscar opportunity, Crowe's female lead is no less than Renee Zellweger, herself no stranger to the golden statuette, having been nominated twice for Best Actress and winning Best Supporting Actress in 2004 for Cold Mountain.
Also a sure thing for at least a handful of nominations is Terrence Malick's The New World. The highly-regarded writer and director has made a rare return to film-making this year with his re-telling of the legend of John Smith (played by Colin Farrell) and Pochahontas (newcomer Q'Orianka Kilcher). The reclusive Malick was nominated for two Oscars for his last feature, 1998's The Thin Red Line, which he'd made after a 20 year sabbatical taken after an impressive start to his career in the 70s with the critically-acclaimed films Badlands and Days Of Heaven. Whatever happens for Malick at the 2006 ceremony, an Academy award must be inevitable for the director at some point - his next project is a biopic of Che Guevara with Oscar-friendly actors Benicio Del Toro and Javier Bardem.
Also worth watching is Malick's star - Colin Farrell. The hype surrounding the actor's Hollywood career might have helped Farrell establish himself as a leading man, but so far Oscar night glory has evaded him. Maybe 2006 is his year?
Another new boy on the block who might be getting his first golden statue next year is Jake Gyllenhaal. The young actor will certainly be dusting down his tux for the night - he has no less than three films out throughout the autumn and winter seasons that he could be representing. In Proof, out in November, he plays second fiddle to Gwyneth Paltrow and Anthony Hopkins. This already Oscar-laden pair play daughter and father respectively, Paltrow's character Catherine coming to the aid of her dying father, a brilliant maths professor who has lost his grip on reality.
The film reunites Paltrow with director John Madden, a coupling that already caught the attention of Oscar in 1999 with the multi-award-winning Shakespeare In Love. Hopkins has, of course, won one Oscar (for The Silence Of The Lambs) and been nominated for a further three, but Gyllenhaal also has war drama Jarhead to rely on for a possible nomination. Based on former Marine Anthony Swofford's best-selling 2003 book about his pre-Desert Storm experiences in Saudi Arabia and about his experiences fighting in Kuwait, the film has Gyllenhaal in his first adult lead as Swofford.
Backed by director Sam Mendes (Best Director for American Beauty in 2000) and co-star Jamie Foxx (Best Actor for Ray this year) the film seems a sure thing for a slew of nominations in March. But Gyllenhaal's final contender could either be his trump card or his albatross. The highly anticipated Brokeback Mountain is Hollywood's first attempt at serious drama with two gay characters as the protagonists. Based on the short story by E. Annie Proulx, who also wrote The Shipping News, the film stars Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger as two ranch hands who meet in the summer of 1963 and fall in love.
Hollywood has been famously reticent about including gay characters in mainstream movies, and when they are it's either in a supporting role or in a comedy - In And Out for example, or The Birdcage. Whether Brokeback Mountain will mark a breakthrough in this area remains to be seen, but with director Ang Lee at the helm (his Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon garnered two Oscar nominations in 2001) the Academy will certainly be casting their eyes over the film.
Another novel making its way to the silver screen this year is Arthur Golden's more high profile Memoirs Of A Geisha. The screen adaptation of the best-selling book has been long awaited, with Madonna long saying she would love to star in the film and Steven Spielberg, who acquired the rights to the book nearly a decade ago, keeping the project on the back burner since he announced he would direct it in 1998. With other projects taking precedence he finally gave up on the idea of directing it himself and last year gave the reigns to Chicago director Rob Marshall, with himself in a producer role.
The film, which is out in January, follows the extraordinary tale of geisha Nitta Sayuri (played by Crouching Tiger's Zhang Ziyi) through 20 years of Japan's turbulent history. Oscar attention is assured, not least because of the film's highly-regarded source material, but also because of Marshall's own past form. In 2003 his film version of the hit stage musical Chicago cleaned up at the Academy Awards with six wins and a further seven nominations, including one for Marshall himself for Best Director.
It may be a musical that takes centre stage again in 2006. Also tipped for Oscar glory is the new film version of Mel Brook's relentlessly award-winning stage show The Producers. Titled The Producers: A Movie Musical for its return to the silver screen (it was also made into an Oscar-winning film back in 1968) this December, the film stars Nathan Lane and Matthew Broderick who reprise their stage roles as shyster theatre producers. Uma Thurman joins them as sexy secretary Ulla, demonstrating her singing skills for the first time on screen. That there will be nominations is highly likely. Where those nominations will land is unclear. Will new director Susan Storman, better known for her choreography, get a nod?
Also out in December is King Kong, the effects-driven remake of the 1933 monster movie classic. Not a likely Oscar-contender you may think, but with Lord Of The Rings director Peter Jackson at the helm we may see a fantasy film clearing up on Oscar night once again. Such a thing was unheard of before Jackson's Lord Of The Rings trilogy hit cinema screens, but such was the overwhelming positive reaction to Jackson's loving adaptations of J.R.R. Tolkien's famous books that Oscar couldn't ignore them and in 2004 the final part of the trilogy, The Return Of The King, won a staggering 11 Academy awards.
Jackson has wanted to remake King Kong, the famous tale of a gigantic gorilla captured in the wild and taken to New York, for some time and the trailer suggests he's given it the same attention to detail and intricate camera work he did Lord Of The Rings. It may be that on March 6 next year one hairy individual will be at the top of a building roaring with joy.
But of course Oscar is far more keen on subjects like politics than giant gorillas and Steve Zaillian's new film version of the Robert Penn Warren novel All The King's Men is sure to get a look-in on Oscar night. It's only Zaillian's third film as a director but as a writer he has been nominated for two Academy awards and won one in 1994 for his screenplay for Schindler's List. The story itself - the life of populist politician Willie Stark, here played by Sean Penn - has a good history. The 1949 film version won three Oscars out of seven nominations. And with Oscar-friendly actors such as Penn, Kate Winslet and Jude Law on board, All The King's Men can't go wrong.
Except there's one film stood in its way. The front-runner for the 2006 Oscars is not Zaillian's remake, nor any of the other films we have already mentioned, but the new film from a certain Steven Spielberg. America's top film critics have claimed that Spielberg's as-yet-untitled film (it has the working title of Vengeance) about the 1972 Munich Olympics is the favourite to get Best Picture. In typical Spielberg fashion, the director has gone from the popcorn pyrotechnics of War Of The Worlds to a heart-rending real-life drama - it tells of the 1972 summer games in Munich at which a group of Palestinian militants kidnapped 11 Israeli athletes. Eric Bana plays the Mossad agent sent to track them down.
With its emotive subject and tragic ending (the athletes perished in a fire fight between police and the kidnappers) the film is perfect Oscar material, and as long as Spielberg can finish the film before the extremely tight December 23 opening it has scheduled in the US, Vengeance could be another Schindler's List (seven wins out of 12 nominations) for the director.
Monday, 15 November 2004
PA - Paul McGann
Happy to be 'I' but not Who; Paul McGann tells Wil Marlow why he forgets lines but never his son's birthday.Paul McGann has been a hard man to get hold of. Other work commitments have meant it's been difficult to tie him down for a chat about his latest TV drama, the romantic thriller Lie With Me. And, as Paul later puts it, 'real life has intervened'.
For the father of two, who lives in Bristol with his wife Annie and their sons Joe, 16, and Jake, 14, had also been making the final arrangements for Jake's impending birthday party.
'It's quite good because his birthday is fireworks night and providing you stay in Britain there's always a do,' says Paul, whose own 45th birthday was yesterday. 'We were actually able to choose, within a week, Jake's birthday for that reason.
'Both our kids were caesarean births and with Jake the consultant said, 'We can do it anytime next week, you choose.' I think that year it was a Monday, so we thought, why don't we get it over with and also it's Bonfire Night, so he'll always have a do. This is how you think as a parent.'
Paul's real life as a family man is very much at odds with the lives he usually portrays on screen. Well-known for playing brooding characters who are often hiding things under their shifty exteriors, Paul, exudes this demeanour to perfection in Lie With Me.
He plays Gerry Henson, a successful art dealer with an insatiable appetite for women that is tolerated by his long-suffering wife. But when Jo, his girlfriend of eight months, is discovered dead by her flatmate Roselyn, the mounting evidence starts to point to him.
With Roselyn's memory a blank concerning the events of the night before, the truth about Gerry's level of involvement in Jo's death remains vague. Soon he finds himself the focus of an unethical plot to implicate him. But did he actually do it?
'I was intrigued by the idea of it,' says Paul of why he took the part. 'And of course the character they wanted me to play was something I enjoy being offered and playing - people that perhaps are slightly morally ambiguous.'
Playing Gerry might have come easily for Paul, but remembering what he was supposed to say was slightly more difficult. The actor sometimes has a habit of forgetting his lines which stems from an episode of stage fright he experienced some years ago.
'It isn't funny really,' he says after laughing at the memory of it. 'It's funny now to talk about but when you're standing there, catatonic, it isn't funny at all. For a performer it's quite nightmarish and knocks your confidence.
'It took me a while to come back from that. I often wondered whether I was going to be able to learn this stuff. I'm not the best, it has to be said, even now. Even in the best conditions of keeping and retaining dialogue, I just can't.
'But, without running myself right down, it is, in my experience, a combination of my weakness and the weakness of the dialogue. I'm prepared to concede only half way,' he laughs. 'Sometimes I think, I'd rather not say that, can't we just act it? In a parallel universe I'm some silent movie star.'
In another parallel universe Paul McGann was, for a long time, Doctor Who and only gave the role up two years ago. In reality, of course, it's a very different matter with the cult sci-fi series only just having been resurrected after the failure of the joint British and American pilot which starred Paul back in 1996.
Paul had signed a six year contract with 20th Century Fox and the BBC to play the Doctor, but in the 'winner takes all' climate of pilot season in America, the Doctor Who film didn't quite garner enough ratings to justify a full series.
When the BBC started filming a new series of Doctor Who with Christopher Eccleston this year, Paul was far from surprised. Despite the low ratings of his pilot in the US, the film had shown that there was still an audience for the Doctor after the BBC had axed the programme in 1989.
'But I was never in the running to play him again,' says Paul. 'I was never called and I never rang them either. Would I have been interested? It's not easy to say - I wasn't interested in doing the pilot to start with.'
Now Paul is resigned to being what he calls 'the George Lazenby of Doctor Who'. As he's played the Doctor in audio books, he's contributed more to the legend than Lazenby did to that of James Bond, but Paul isn't too bothered by the label.
'Somebody's got to be, I suppose it might as well be me,' he says. 'I don't regret anything about the Doctor Who experience. As a professional and certainly as a family man, the things I think most about now is how close we were to moving to America, how close my kids were to going to American schools, and how close I was to millions of dollars. But I think of those things only idly because they never happened.'
Instead, the Withnail And I star continued the varied career that began at 20. He almost never became an actor at all. While he was growing up in Liverpool, he long harboured dreams of becoming an Olympic athlete.
'It didn't work out, just from my own lookout,' he says. 'I'd fallen by the wayside. And when it doesn't work out you have to lower your sights and change your view. So I became an actor, and I've loved it, but there it is. I'm on my second choice profession. Such is life.'
Paul is probably the most famous of the McGann acting dynasty, which also includes his brothers Joe, Mark, and Stephen. As yet, Paul's own sons don't look set to continue the acting tradition.
'Thankfully, no,' he says. 'I would try my damnedest to dissuade them if they did. You should always try and stop people from following acting because it's only really the people that cannot possibly be stopped or dissuaded that should be the ones doing it. It's too hard otherwise.'
Things are far from hard for Paul at the moment, however. We'll next see him in a starring role in the BBC's new adaptation of the Robert Louis Stevenson classic Kidnapped, which was filmed in New Zealand.
'I think it's going to be a good piece,' he says. 'I had a laugh. I play the nasty Englishman in pursuit of the noble Scot. Playing baddies is great. You just get on your horse and wield your sword, shout your head off, that kind of thing. I like all that.'
Friday, 17 September 2004
PA - Bryan Adams

A lonely life on tour; Bryan Adams tells Wil Marlow how he fills the 22 hours a day when he's not on stage
Despite being a seasoned live performer, with over two decades of live performances under his belt, Bryan Adams still gets nervous about going on stage.
'I've got a gig coming up on Saturday and I'm petrified,' laughs the singer. 'I always get nervous, especially when it's new songs, because you don't know how they're going to go over.
'I also worry I'm not going to remember the words, that sort of thing. Sometimes I'll look down and think, what's the second verse? But then I'll see someone in the audience singing and it'll come back. I always pray and hope I don't mess it up.'
But the 44-year-old admits that sometimes, quite a lot actually, he does mess it up when he's up there belting out hits like Run To You and (Everything I Do) I Do It For You, despite having played these songs for years.
'Have I ever made a mistake? What, every night you mean?' he grins. 'That's what playing live's about though. It's never going to be perfect.'
He might not be perfect but that hasn't stopped millions of his fans around the world being an unfailing presence wherever he plays. And Bryan Adams plays a lot. Ever since the Ontario-born singer first hit the big time in the early 80s, he's been a diligent live performer.
'I go on tour all the time but I don't do it like I used to,' says Bryan. 'We go out for like a week a month now. But it's one of the most important parts of the job.
'You find yourself when you're on tour. You find yourself musically with your band, you figure out what music works for you - you figure out your voice and your sound.
'I think if I was to ever give advice to any young musician I'd say go on the road, because that's where you find your feet. To really make it work for yourself longterm, you've got to be a touring musician. 'I do have a love of it as well, and not much else to do basically,' he laughs. 'I'm like, I'm a musician, let's go on the road, man.'
Bryan, who currently lives in London, hits the road in the UK next month for a ten-date arena tour and, despite having a new album out - the forthcoming Room Service, his first for three years - he says his fans can expect mostly Bryan Adams classics, with some of the new ones slipped in.
'I won't have tons of the new songs because people probably won't know them yet,' he explains. 'Our live shows are pretty much just the songs that people know. Otherwise, they just sit there and go, 'What?'. It's nice to give people what they want and it's the old hits they've come to see.'
This includes Bryan's massive world-wide smash, (Everything I Do) I Do It For You. You might think the singer would be bored to tears of his ballad - the theme tune of the hit film Robin Hood: Prince Of Thieves - which was inescapable for much of the early 90s and famously stayed at No 1 in this country for a staggering 16 weeks.
'We never knew that song was going to be massive,' says Bryan. 'I thought it was a sweet song but at one point we were talking about putting it out as a B-side, I swear!
'But it's hard to get bored of it because people like it so much. There's always a good reaction.'
Bryan can barely remember that period of his career. The early 90s went crazy for him with the success of Everything I Do and his album, Waking Up The Neighbours.
'Years went by in the 90s when I couldn't tell you where I was,' he says. 'I know I was out there somewhere but everything was a blur. If it wasn't for film documentation or the occasional photograph I could not tell you what I did.'
Though life is marginally less hectic these days, listening to Room Service, the title track from his new album, you get the feeling that while he still enjoys touring, Bryan has become a bit jaded by a life on the road.
'The song deals with the idea that touring can be very lonely,' he says. 'I just wanted to turn the peephole in the hotel door round so you could see into my world a little bit. It's not always like that, but you do end up really missing the things you have at home.'
To relieve the boredom during the past two years of touring, Bryan spent his time recording Room Service. Before he used to 'go kind of nuts, a bit stir crazy', so on recent tours he's used any spare time to write and record.
'I'm only on stage for two hours, so you've got 22 hours sitting around or travelling,' says Bryan. 'I tried to make use of the time which is generally spent doing nothing.
'I'd built a little studio that fit into a couple of suitcases and we'd get a couple of hotel rooms, order room service and record.
'It was better than being in a studio, because studios are boring and the food's generally awful. Sometimes we'd have to move everything around in the hotel room though. Did the staff mind? No, they'd normally help.'
Bryan will be doing the same again on this tour. He's already got another album ready to go, comprised of acoustic tracks that he recorded at the same time as Room Service. He's also working on his first French language album, something he was inspired to do after recording the soundtrack to the animated film Spirit: StallionOf The Cimarron in 2002.
'I like singing in French and the Spirit soundtrack was just a great experience,' he says. 'I can speak French quite well, so I understand what I'm saying. I've been asked to sing in other languages too, but at least in French I still get it.'
Whatever he does, Bryan's popularity remains enduring. With a career spanning nearly 30 years ('Don't,' he laughs, 'That's just cruel!') the 'groover from Vancouver' is showing no signs of slowing down.
'There is no crystal ball for me to tell you how long I'll carry on,' he says. 'But as long as it's inspiring, my music's inspired and my tunes get people off, then I'll continue.'
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)